U fokusu rada Instituta za evropske poslove je praćenje pregovora Srbije sa EU i jačanje kapaciteta svih uključenih u procesu. Imajući u vidu složenost i dugotrajnost ovog procesa, Institut okuplja veliki broj stručnih saradnika sa kojima organizuje treninge, debate i druga usavršavanja zato što želimo da svojim radom doprnesemo boljem razumevanju evroatlantskih integracija. Institut radi na organizovanju treninga i pružanju multiperspektivnih informacija kako bismo omogućili aktivno učešće stručne javnosti i građana u procese donošenja odluka. Institut aktivno zagovara i zalaže se za temeljne reforme u okviru pegovaračkog procesa i u saradnji sa partnerima jačamo kapacitete Srbije da se suoči sa izazovima u globalnom svetu kroz zajedničko delovanje, koje za krajnji cilj ima aktivno članstvo Srbije u evroatlantskim okvirima za dobrobit svih građana.

Narrative Report

Ambassadors’ name Krenar Shala
Date of the discussion 20th of January, 2014
Place and address EU Information and Cultural Center
Name and contact person in the Institution Dafina Zherka; dzherka@euicc-ks.com
Number of Participants 23
No of female Participants 10
No of Male Participants 13
Occupation of the Participants n/a

Krenar Shala_Photo2

What was the topic of the discussion and how was organised?

The topic of the discussion was: “The Dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia. Reconciliation and a common future in the European Union?”

Explain the reaction of the participants on your speech.

This discussion was preceded with a panel consisting of the President of the Alpbach Initiative Group Kosovo, Mr. Shkumbin Asllani; Ilir Deda, Director at KIPRED; Ms. Ulrike Lunacek, Reportour for Kosovo at European Parliament; and Mr. Petrit Selimi, Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs.

In the beginning there was a presentation of viewpoints of the panellists following with the questions and comments from other participants. Very well know ambassadors serving in Kosovo also took place in the discussion. Additionally, there was some tension among some panellists but overall the discussion went smoothly and broadly analyzed by both the panellists and participants.

This discussion was considered by many as a very valuable as well as it happened for the first time in Kosovo among civil society and other non-state actors of society.

Have you notice the impact of your lecture on the participants? Explain.

The desire to take place in the discussion no matter the occupation, age etc. Additionally, as previously mentioned, almost all of the participants were eager to express their opinion on the matter. The other point which made this discussion interesting was the very different standpoint coming from participants who undoubtedly contributed to making the discussion valuable and worthy.

What were the questions posed by the participants and how did you react?

Questions posed to panellists were of various natures in regards to the context of the topic of discussion. Participants helped the discussion direct in many ways so the most pressing points of the topic had to be analyzed giving concrete steps as to have the situation can change for the better. The most dominant points were the Brussels Agreements as well as the economic development, rule of law, and the institutional and society democratization as the main elements to make parties have mutual understanding to deal with the issues concerning both parties.

Ostavite odgovor

Vaša adresa e-pošte neće biti objavljena. Neophodna polja su označena *

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons