|
What was the topic of the discussion and how was organised? |
|
Reconciliation as an imperative for moving on. After our introduction speech we saw the movie A Letter, and then we discussed some life situations the participants were in. It was organised as a discussion in which Sanida and I were the moderators. The discussion was planned to last for an hour and a half, but it lasted for two and a half hours instead due to the interest of the participants. |
|
Explain the reaction of the participants on your speech. |
| Right after our introduction speech the participants didn’t start actively participating in the discussion, but after some encouragement the discussion was pretty intense. |
|
Have you notice the impact of your lecture on the participants? Explain. |
| Some of the participants had a very strict attitude when it came to blaming Serbia and Serbs for the past events, but when we gave them an example how Bosniaks committed a crime they realized that they couldn’t identify themselves as a part of the same group, thus they realized that they cannot generalize an entire nation for a crime of a single person. |
|
What were the questions posed by the participants and how did you react? |
| We planned our peer to peer education as a discussion. Most of the things we discussed were events from the participants lives, meaning that participants didn’t ask us many questions. |
