It is necessary to speak openly about the need for reconciliation and what we can do to help restore understanding among the peoples of the former Yugoslavia.
Greatest contribution to regional reconciliation is not to forget people who were killed in a massacre in every direction.
This not include contributions from the Justice and Reconciliation only symbolic compensation to families of victims in terms of building monuments or a small allowance.
On the contrary, as our contribution to the society in transition should be much larger and more open. Why should students of history should serve only as a means idoctrination? Idoctrination from school books should not affect our opinion and judgment free. The family as the basic unit of society, schools, the media, political community and the Church the greatest impact on perceptions. It is devastating our society because I will live forever in error and we will never have the need to further examine the fact that we were served.
To be able to say that we are a responsible citizen of his country’s need to constantly ask for answers because we deserve to be informed. Being uncomfortable citizen … it is very important because it develops critical awareness. Being uncomfortable citizen means to love his country and his family company, progress towards him and want to better prospects.
The fact is that very little raise issues of negative consequences for the country after the war. In the film In the Land of Blood and Honey is not a single scene is exaggerated. All evidence found any of the testimony of the victims. My opinion is that every individual needs to talk about bad things your country even if it unplesant. Do not allow others to open our eyes as Brecht says (I’ll talk about my shame and not someone else).
It is frightening to watch as systematic, focused idoktrination creates a distorted view. People are beginning to think like their idols, the political elite, they become a robo systems that are not even aware of. Obedience, preference for leaders, blind loyalty to people born without critical judgment. These individuals become politically minded and they can not be expected to work to change the situation for future generations.situation tributary democracy in suits our political leader they do not have to give account anyone because none of them are not even looking. Nationalism, today carries a negative advance as it was in 1970. or in 1980. Nationalism is now a common practice in a country that means protecting and defending their own. It is wrong to use nationalism to justify their dissatisfaction or worse that our nationalism is a primary identity. A lot of things we can not change without the help of others whatever you call them, the great powers or something. Changed themselves, become more serious, more worker and determined to solve the problem. It all starts at the local level and for all there is a chance we just have to work hard and believe in ourselves that we will not be able to. To achieve the goal and took the first steps toward reconciliation in the region, it is necessary to suppress our prejudices. I always keep in mind that the only immediate solution lie. To get to the truth that will be acceptable to all parties is necessary to have a dialogue, not war .(What comes out of me does not surprise me as much as what comes out the other.) Jorge Luis Borghese. Two men who know how to talk to yourself and others can vastly enrich and develop.
It is my opinion that violence does not respond to an act of violence. Equality, justice and freedom are ideals to which I as a young person want to achive People need to be aware of their potential and to use it in the right direction in the fight against violence and indoctrination. In order to achieve a state of peace and community needs to exert individual effort and gather relevant information from all sides. Each individual needs to commit to his knowledge that another man’s wake from its lethargy and belief in one truth with which he lives. It makes sense that people want justice for their loved ones who have lost their focus on the war. They pray for justice, but when they get it and they are not satisfied. They are not happy because they have their own perception of justice in what it should be. It’s not a civil liability because people looked at the big picture of all the events. Our changes and acceptance of the truths of our other so-called enemy has to happen every day, constantly. It’s not just enough to change behavior, change, going from individualized level in our community through the institutions of the ultimate goal and that is the system. The biggest problem of democracy today is that people do not know all the information put together in the right way, turn off emotions and think rationally. We may not be brave enough? Courage comes when someone animate and crazy behind their actions. If one person alone has to run and take the first step to go very hard. No one suggests that the reconciliation comes easy road, it is still a process that requires that undergo a phase. Not easy to be a freedom fighter for peace and perspective. Often such an individual system as undesirable as a traitor as traitors and called journalists who reported on war abominations. You need to have patience and the willingness to make sacrifices because first of all to think about the promising future. Communication is encouraged violent conflict and produces fear of others, of the logic that one must go to be able to live. Non-violent and non-aggressive communication is a right way and for those who consider themselves winners as well as those who consider themselves defeated. It is among other things, neutralize the effects of post-war hatred between nations and ethnic groups that were in conflict. In any case school should not be taught that patriotism, love for his nation should not show hatred towards against another nation. Everyone needs to motivate and oppose the spread of the ideology of war crimes. The problems between the ethnic groups do not need to resolve conflicts and least asakrima war. We can not reverse themselves soybeans early opening new wounds in others. If you constantly emphasize what distinguishes humans not what brings them together, what makes the fight should not make peace if the poll asked leading questions of who is who admires, rather than who is to blame for the animosity is still like that, why do not you love others, rather than whether it is normal for people to hate, who is to blame for the war, instead of what should be done to war never happens again. Then, what is emphasizing that even 25% of Bosniaks believe that there is no reason to admire the Serbs, 50% do not like Serbs as violent and aggressive, more so wisely concluded that the Bosnians Serbs did not make any positive characteristic. In mutual evaluation three people none of the relationships did not get a clean triple, everything below. Bosnians Serbs as the two biggest people think the worst about each other until they both have a better opinion of the Croats and Croats about them.
We need more contact with each other and talk about the future, living standards, trust and adapting to European principles and less talk about the past, guilt, crime and lack of functioning government without its complete renovation or demolition. Private one state at any cost should not be static. On the contrary, each individual needs to be a researcher, to explore and do not accept what you hear at face value. Any progress and perspectives necessary to require that they take the initiative to get rid of stereotypes and myths that cling to them and not allow them to go through more realistic. The mythic world that is present among the residents of the Balkans are increasingly leading them into the abyss. Abyss is deeper because it is a paradox that happens behind the rest of Europe and even the rest of the world. We do the best we can only themselves to pomegnemo so we will turn the inner and spiritual development. Be an example to their peers, young people, children and even our parents, grandmothers and grandfathers. I think that we do not have any more time and even allow themselves the luxury of inactivity and do not work. Let’s be entrepreneurial and take matters into their own hands. No individual should be allowed to agents of primary socialization influence their perception of the political process in the country. National attachment and patriotism, party identification are affective component which every man has but must strive to overcome them and to include rational reasoning about the past. The truth is that children who develop early positive feelings toward their own political system, whatever it may be, grow as people whose trust in the political system is very difficult to break down. Early political experience and learning about politics in the family is related to the later political behavior. We should not blindly trust our media, because they often do not speak the truth. Let’s check the facts more than once, no information ujimajmo served lightly. The truth is that the media and its journalists pristrasnoću can greatly affect the viewers, ordinary people. Not only that our society must confront the aftermath of the event. Young people need to build a healthy relationship to the past and this can only be done if you do not clog up the past under the carpet. Our collective responsibility is of crucial importance to the state, because we have to solve advanced division. It’s not the people committing crimes and injustice, they did individuals but we have to be responsible and we should close our eyes to the true facts. An individual can not affect the operation of the courts, but it may act to influence on their peers. Good information makes people brave and not abiding citizens. It is necessary to realize that the problems of the past left a legacy of young people who are obliged to form their own opinions. Education is a necessary condition for the development of dialogue and tolerance for others.
Bibliography of sources:
Fromm, Eric, Beyond the chains of illusion, (Forward, Nolit, Zagreb, 1986.).
Hayek, A.F., The Road to Serfdom, (Global Book, Novi Sad, 1997.).
Osmancevic, Anas, Democracy communications, (Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Sarajevo, 2009.).
Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples, (Alexandria Press and the New Serbian Political Thought, Belgrade, 2003.).
